Copyright Violations

Kerals.com – The new wave of plagiarism from blogs

2008-05-30T16:32:00.001-07:00

Blogger Saji noticed that a number of blog posts including his were used without permission by kerals.com and he notified kerals and put a post regarding this to notify others. There were around 300 blog posts that were copied without permission.

Following this Anilshree put a post supporting Saji's findings to attract more attention to this major issue. Though none of AnilShree's posts were copied, he wanted to gather more support for this issue. Bloggers who found their content on kerals.com were outraged and as the first step, sent an email to Kerals.com.

When informed that there was no response to Saji for 4 days, a support ticket was sent asking them to take down the contents or it will be reported to hosting provider or Google Adsense.

To this a very rude abusive reply was shot back from their Director Mr. Shiv Kumar.

Later an array of mails and threats, phising attempt, and even a forging email were followed from Chris, Ajay, POP, Shiv Kumar – all employees or owners of Kerals.com. Anilshree was too warned and threatened by kerals.com of consequences and was forced to take down his post.

But most other bloggers stay put. Strangely, whoever complained was banned from accessing kerals.com site too, in order to conceal evidence of fraud.
Bloggers complained to theplanet.com (copyright@theplanet.com), the hosting provider for Kerals.com and to Google Ad sense which clearly states they follow the DCMA guidelines and will not allow adsense on copied contents.

Kerals.com started to realize things were getting serious and started to remove the content and informed a few bloggers about it.

However they wanted (or rather ordered) to take down the posts of bloggers when the posts were removed. This is not necessary as blog like any other medium is protected under freedom of speech. When they were informed of posts were removed, bloggers put posts updating the status of their individual case.

Even then, more bloggers received threats and in form of fake legal notices. Some emails even claim to have photographs (a clear case of cyber stalking) of bloggers and addresses. Have no idea what kerals.com is going to achieve with such kind of tricks which is going to land them up in more trouble.

These are the bloggers posts whose contents were stolen and put posts on this Issue:

1. Aravind
2. Thulasi
3. Valyammayi (Around 25 of her blog posts were lifted)
4. Kannus
5. Saji
(Saji with screenshots)
6. Peringodan
7. Mayoora (Update)
8. Satheesh KM
9. Agrajan

Bloggers who are joining the protest as a good will gesture.
10. Cibu
11. BlogBharti
12. Njaan
13. Daly
14. Pramod
15. Anchalkkaran
16. Reshma
17. Bhoomiputhri
18. Inji Pennu
Email header forging
19. P.R
20. Idangal
21. I Report by Malayali

What do the Bloggers want?

Most bloggers are satisfied with their content being taken off the site. They are not even asking for a public apology. Yet, the threats and harassment continues.

Some bloggers are getting ready to sue the company for copyright infringement and cyber stalking and other harassment.

Details about Kerals.com:

Their whois records shows kerals.com is served from sreela.com a site for pornography.

Their company registration address shows:

Groups, Anashwara
Anashwara Groups LTD
8564 Green ford ct
Srinagar, 659874
India
565499874 Fax --

Anashwara Groups - Suite 27,
Nehru Park Way,
Srinagar 190 001,
Jammu & Kashmir, India

Anaswara Groups
87a Topui Road
Srinagar, Jammu Kashmir 65598, ,
INDIA
Phone: 6659874556

Anashwara group also owns malayalampadam.com a website with Illegal Malayalam movies, which was already caught once by the police.

(More posts will be added as the issue continues. Please leave comments if you want your post to be added)

FAQ - Copyright Violation by Yahoo

2007-03-29T14:43:00.000-07:00

A brief History

Yahoo India launched a multi-lingual portal for seven of the Indian Languages.
While browsing through the portal bloggers spotted around 8 instances of plagiarism by Yahoo! India. They were primarily poems, articles, recipes written in Malayalam copied to Yahoo! India's new Malayalam portal. Poems which another web magazine (Puzha.com) remunerated the authors and published it on their online magazine were copied into Yahoo's portal pages.
Yahoo! India Portal had a copyright violation report page, with the Yahoo! Inc email and mailing address. After complaining to Yahoo! Inc, they redirected bloggers to Yahoo! India and Webdunia, causing the bloggers to run in circles. These games were played for about a month. Yahoo! India even denied any incident of plagiarism or copyright violation prior to March 5th Protest.
However, as soon as the complaints were made, Yahoo deleted the copied content. But an acknowledgement or a proper apology was missing.
Yahoo! India shared personal contact details of the bloggers who complained by emails, to a third party (WebDunia), without permission from bloggers.

List of Evidence (updated periodically):

2007-Mar-29: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from India's leading National Newspaper "The Hindu". Picture from The Hindu. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-29: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from India's leading newsportal Rediff.com. Picture from Rediff.com. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-29: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from a very popular online recipe site bawarchi.com. Picture from bawarchi.com. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-29: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from an online recipe site, cuisinecuisine.com. Picture from cuisinecuisine.com. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-29: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from an online business site, Soghat.com. This picture had a watermark, Yahoo even copied the watermark. Picture from Soghat.com. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-15: 1 instance of Hindi poem was stolen by Yahoo India without authors knowledge or permission. Article in Hindi.
2007-Mar-13: 1 (one) instance of content theft, by which a photograph from Sailu's Food was stolen by Yahoo India. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot. Yahoo India cropped this picture, and used it in a Gujarati Page elsewhere.
2007-Mar-13: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from Saffron Hut was stolen by Yahoo India. Yahoo India cropped the picture and used it in a Hindi Page. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-13: 1 instance of content theft, by which a photograph from Shilpa's blog was lifted and used by Yahoo India on a Kannada Page. Yahoo stolen picture screen shot.
2007-Mar-13: 1 instance of content theft, by which this picture from Anita's post was cropped and used by Yahoo India to further "glorify" the theft from Kariveppila.
2007-Feb-05: Nalapachakam, chintha , moonnaamidam . Nalapachakam, entire blog was eaten up by Yahoo. Literature from Chintha and Moonamidam. Unfortunately, by the time people were notified, Yahoo removed the contents.
2007-Feb-05: 6 instances of content theft committed from Kariveppila blog. Post in Kariveppila blog.
2007-Feb-02: 1 instance of content theft committed, by which a poem from Puzha.com was stolen by Yahoo India. Post in Puzha.com

(Thank you Valli from China, a non-blogger but an avid reader of Mahanandi, who brought forth many evidence for this post)

How did bloggers expect Yahoo to handle the issue?

A written apology from Yahoo to be sent to each blogger whose content was stolen (hereafter referred to as affected blogger).
If a specific affected blogger demands monetary compensation for his/her work, Yahoo should honor that as well.
If a settlement is reached between an affected blogger and Yahoo, the affected blogger should be allowed to make the details of settlement public if he or she chooses to do so.
Such a settlement, if reached, between an affected blogger and Yahoo, would mean that the matter shall be construed as resolved amicably and no claim shall be made or caused to be made by either of the involved parties in future in this regard.

Why did bloggers refuse to talk to Webdunia?

Blog contents were found on Yahoo's domain. Evidence for affected bloggers were only on Yahoo's domain. Yahoo owns the portal. Therefore, any official apology should come from Yahoo! India - not from their contractor (WebDunia).

Did WebDunia try to contact the bloggers or solve the issue?

Though Webdunia was never directly contacted by any affected bloggers, WebDunia obtained bloggers' contact information presumably through Yahoo India without the consent from the respective bloggers. WebDunia tried to influence the bloggers by offering money without a public apology, if bloggers retracted the complaints. These routes were unacceptable to the bloggers. When everything failed, WebDunia tried to create a public discussion mockery by creating a vague Wordpress blog with no name or address. They did not even host this on their portal. This 'discussion' failed miserably as no bloggers participated and bloggers called their bluff.

How did bloggers protest?

Around 150 bloggers voiced their protest by publishing posts simultaneously on March 5th. Many drew interesting cartoons also. Event details which has the collection of posts, excerpts and cartoons.

What happened after March 5th? Did Yahoo apologise?

Yahoo (sort of) apologized without naming the bloggers or their blogs. They played with the media giving out statements that they will be apologizing, but they kind of did a half-baked apology, apologizing only for non-attribution. Bloggers had stated many times, issue is not about attribution but it is only about copyright violation and stolen contents. The apology was put in Malayalam in the recipe section under 'continental' (whatever that is).

Why is the apology appeared on Yahoo's Malayalam portal not sufficient?

There were following problems with the apology:

Yahoo didn't send an apology to the affected bloggers through email or postal address.
Statement of apology didn't specifically mention the name of the affected blogger(s) or the blog(s).
It was not visibly linked anywhere from the portal.
Yahoo was constantly moving the apology page in the portal - may be to prevent link information being spread through email.
The so-called 'Apology' appeared just in Malayalam portal whereas their malpractice is spread over several languages.

Why is WebDunia blamed now? i.e. after March 5th?

When content plagiarising was spotted, there were no indication that Webdunia was the contractor who supplied the contents from blogs. After bloggers protest on March 5th, Yahoo! made a public statement that Webdunia is the contractor who supplied the copied content. After the 'apology' statement on March 9th, Yahoo's contents had a footer that said, 'source: webdunia' under each article in the portal. From that day onwards, Yahoo! and Webdunia were considered co-defendants in this copyright violation.

After the protest on March 5th, were there any other incidents of copyright violation?

Yes. After March 5th, when the issue got public attention, many bloggers came forward to report more violations. Pictures and other literature were reported stolen from couple of blogs and even poems of contemporary authors were lifted without any consent from the respective parties. Details:

Food pictures were copied from various blogs. Yahoo! removed the copyright statements and watermarks from the pictures. Some pictures were tilted and modified. Criminal intend is evident here.
Yahoo! copied pictures from Telugu food blogs and used them in their Gujarati portal. Possibly under the impression, a Telugu speaking person would naturally not visit a Gujarati language portal.
Another incident of copying a Hindi poem is also reported.
See List of Evidence (at the begining for updates).

Will there be a lawsuit?

A court case is very much likely to erupt any time. It could be a class action suite or it could even be individually filed. Since blogs are ultimately individual entities, any affected blogger could proceed through a legal movement, depending upon his or her own motivation and urge. As the malpractice seems to take different counts, a possibility of filing a case (and the chance of it being a successful one) are getting enhanced as the time goes by.

What is the validity of legal action? Some say recipes are not copyrighted?

In recipes, listing of ingredients is the only thing that is not copyrightable. Similarly, news is not copyrightable. However, if there recipes written or news reported has any form of literary expression, then they clearly come under copyright laws. Please refer this article from SPICYIP blog.

CIOL writes in detail about copyrights in India, in this article: Press Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V for trouble

Excerpt from the article:

It is about giving expression to an idea in an original form,” says Pavan Duggal, Supreme Court lawyer and a Cyber Law expert. “For example, there is no copyright on a love story, whether Premchand or Shakespeare write it, but the style of delivery. In other words, the output can be protected. Anyone found guilty of infringing copyrights are liable for civil and criminal charges and can claim for compensation.”

Dr Sebastian Paul, an advocate and an expert on copyright issues, echoes the similar view and says that no stranger can make use of content in any manner without the explicit permission of the owner of the site. “It does not matter whether it is printed matter or a website or a blog,” says Dr Paul, who is also a Member of Parliament from Kerala.

Was there a Press coverage?

Media has given a good coverage so far. Please visit collection of media reports and other links at CopyRightViolations (this) blog.

How to obtain information about new developments regarding this?

Please visit this blog (CopyRightViolations ) for updates.

How can I help?

As a blogger, you can post an article about the incident on your blog with appropriate links. If you have a popular blog it would immensely help to spread the word. This affects the entire blogging community, future existence of blogs.
As a lawyer, you could leave a comment on advising us bloggers about possible legal options and implications.
As a journalist, you can expose such undermining and illegal actions perpetrated regularly by multinational conglomerates.
Or drop us a line and tell us how you can help!

Yahoo's Content Head Fired?

2007-03-22T22:16:00.000-07:00

Agencies and bloggers report that Yahoo's Head of Content Ajay Nambiar and Head of Entertainment Niyati Sen Gupta had left Yahoo! India. There have been conflicting reports about the resignation of these top Yahoo executives.

AgencyFAQs reports:

While both Yahoo! and Ajay Nambiar insisted that the recent departures had nothing to do with the content controversy, it’s no secret that the headquarters at Santa Clara (California) was seeking to upgrade content from India. In fact, the top brass at Yahoo! – including Nambiar – recently went to the global headquarters to discuss the issue.

Read complete story.

Related links:

Recipes are copyrightable in India

2007-03-22T22:15:00.000-07:00

Mrinalini Kochupillai with SPICY IP says "In India [...] there is no law [...] that prohibits copyright protection from being granted to recipes."

In Govindan v Gopalakrishna (1955 – case relating to compilation) (quoted in Burlington – discussed below), it was held that even if the amount of originality in a compilation is very small, the same is protected by law and no one can appropriate the result of another's brain, skill or labour even in such works. Arguably, if a small creative input in a compilation is copyrightable, a recipe, particularly original instructions in a recipe will certainly be copyrightable in India.

Read the complete story here:
Yahoo! In Hot Pickle

Yahoo! India Caught Plagiarizing... Again!

2007-03-20T17:24:00.000-07:00

Amit Agarwal at the Digital Inspiration reports that Yahoo! India hasn't stopped what they do best: plagiarizing blog posts.

In the lastest episode; Mr. Agarwal says:

For instance, this poem on Yahoo! website was written by Ramdarsh Mishra, a Delhi based poet. When contacted over phone by another blogger, Ramdarsh confirmed that neither Yahoo! nor WebDunia (Yahoo's content provider) had taken permission before publishing his work on Yahoo!'s website.

Dhur Virodhi, who is actively tracking the story, has listed several instances
where even the author names are missing from the poems published on Yahoo! Hindi website.

Read the complete story here.

Related News:

Instances of Content theft by Yahoo India

2007-03-15T04:51:00.001-07:00

6 instances of Content Theft they committed from Kariveppila blog. Sample screenshots below:

1 (one) instance of Content Theft they committed, by which a poem from Puzha.com was stolen by Yahoo India. (Screnshots: Original Page and Stolen Page in Yahoo's Domain)

1 (one) instance of Content Theft from Nalapachakaam, on Chicken 360.

1 (one) instance of Content Theft, by which this picture from Anita's post was cropped and used by Yahoo India to further "glorify" the theft in item 1. (Screenshot below)

1 (one) instance of Content Theft, by which a photograph from Shilpa's blog was lifted and used by Yahoo India on a Kannada Page. (Screenshot below)

1 (one) instance of Content Theft, by which a photograph from Saffron Hut was stolen by Yahoo India. Yahoo India cropped the picture and used it in a Hindi Page. (Screenshot below)

1 (one) instance of Content Theft, by which a photograph from Sailu's Food was stolen by Yahoo India. Yahoo India cropped this picture, and used it in a Gujarati Page elsewhere. (Screenshot )

Yahoo and Webdunia - The inside story!

2007-03-01T10:40:00.000-08:00

It is a little amusing, amazing and agonizing to see how the corporate world looks at the blogs and bloggers as silly little creatures which they can play with, manipulate and crush at their will.

As we know, on the issue of plagiarizing contents from Malayalam blog world to startup the so-called revolution of the language portals, Yahoo somehow still takes the 'That's not my kid' attitude. It has been a point-the-finger-at-him game all the way, where the bloggers were taken for a ride. We feel that it was an attempt to see if they can disorient the sense of direction among the blogging community. Despite Yahoo's stand on the issue being obscure, it was interesting to see the company called WebDunia, who claimed at that point of being the "content provider's " for the corporate giant(s), without being named anywhere, getting their back burned for this.

WebDunia scrambled and tried their ways, showing their faces from the happy to the sad to the bad, lest they could fail. Days flew by, the words flew by and the issue remained unscathed and colorful. A few of the blogger friends became scapegoats in the crossfire. It was a sad site to watch, where brothers and sisters standing against one another, fighting with the mighty words, whose wounds are hard to heal. On a glance, it may seem ironic that the corporate friends still made money as they used to do and the friends couldn't talk to each other anymore. Dabble they did in the chorus we sung, but the hand wasn't strong enough to slay the wave.

Bloggers appealed to the community for a protest on March 5th, and then from nowhere appears an email from WebDunia to some of our blogger friends 'inviting' them to take part in a 'discussion' on march second on a blog and not in the so called portal they run.

Is this a coincidence? The history makes us to believe the other way. Despise have we taken ever since, to believe in the good sense and it has taught us to look at their act in distrust. The more we ponder, the more the questions un-answered.

The question that needs an answer is,

"Why public, whilst the issue in question has not been settled among the parties?" The only reason we think off is to let the hands to try break the wave. We believe that WebDuniya and Yahoo are well aware of the power of blogger unity and the long term impacts it can make to their corporate future. They are desperate to get this movement to fail with the reputation at stake.

They may want to divert the attention of the bloggers by the age old British ploy – "Divide and rule". That's what they did when they tried the drama by employing the friends of the blog world to speak for them. That's what they did when they played the forcing game on people involved.

Why would it not be taken as another ploy of the same order this time? Why would we assume good faith, when the faith was stabbed to death by their deeds? Why invite a handful of bloggers, while it was appropriate put up an article in their own site and invite readers? There are a lot more whys and whats that seek eternity and reasonable answers.

It is an appeal to our friends who were hurt in the cross fire to stand together on one side of the line and lets set things right Once and for all! We were together, we should be together and we need to stand together arms-in-arms to move forward. I believe we have enough trouble in real life and wouldn't want to fight over.

Please Join us on March 5th to protest against Yahoo's plagiarism.

March 5th 2007 - Blog Event against Plagiarism!

2007-02-28T13:45:00.000-08:00

Join us on March 5th against plagiarism from blogs. Event details here.

Jif Credits : ziya

Yahoo blames it on subcontractors when caught on plagiarism

2007-02-19T17:15:00.000-08:00

Finally Yahoo! India (someone at customer care, not an official) responded to our many emails stating:

The Malayalam story was provided to us by Webdunia.com (the content provider) on the express representation that they are duly authorized by the author of the story to publish it. In the circumstances therefore, we do not admit of any copyright violation, as alleged by you.

Although there is no copyright violation and without prejudice to our rights, the said story has been removed from our web site, to avoid any further controversy.Should you have any further concerns on copyright violations, please write in to copyright@webdunia.com and it will be addressed by the webdunia team.

Yahoo even denies that there was any copyright violation, even when they instantly removed it from their servers when caught. If there was no copyright violation, why would anyone care to remove it? Or are they claiming blogs do not have copyright laws?

Yahoo! India and their subcontractors are their concern, not us bloggers. By asking us to contact subcontractors is nothing but pure arrogance from this multinational corporation, giving no respect to the law and procedures existing in a country.

The content appeared on Yahoo‘s domain, not on Webdunia.com’s domain.
The content appeared on Yahoo’s portal, not on Webdunia.com’s portal.

Our aim is to get a response from Yahoo, acknowledging their mistake. Our fight will continue until then.

Yahoo! India commits plagiarism.

2007-02-14T14:35:00.000-08:00

On Feb 2, 2007 or so, Yahoo started a Malayalam Portal in Unicode Malayalam, and shortly thereafter, we noticed that contents were being lifted out of Malayalam blogs, contents that were copyrighted by each author.

Among the worst affected was Suryagayatri. At least 5 recipes from her Kariveppila Blog were taken, slightly modified (pictures, re-arrangement of sentences) and placed on Yahoo's Malayalam Portal.
(Ref: English Version of what happened, Screenshots of violation)

Yahoo India also took, without permission, contents from http://www.puzha.com/. Puzha.com maintains that they had bought the original content, which was then stolen by Yahoo India. (Ref: Puzha blog entry detailing this theft)

When we learned about the infringement and protested against it, Yahoo's content provider, Webdunia, removed the contents. So far, the blogger's efforts (and our collective efforts) to procure an official response from Yahoo have been in vain.

Yahoo.com directs us to Yahoo! India as they claim Yahoo India is a separate entity. Yahoo India on the other hand directs us back to Yahoo.com, making us run in circles with no clear response.

While we were researching Yahoo's content providers, we came across a provider, Webdunia (mentioned before). From our investigation, we found that they are the ones who collect information/features/articles to be posted on Yahoo India.

With the knowledge that we had made a formal complaint to Yahoo/Yahoo India, Webdunia came forward with vague options for remuneration as well as an apology from Webdunia and not from Yahoo India.

Suryagayathri has refused all offers because she/we believe that Yahoo is solely responsible for this mistake and should make a formal acknowledgment. In addition, Webdunia wanted us to quickly and quietly accept an offer so that they would not lose their contract with Yahoo India.

Our aim is to get a response from Yahoo, acknowledging their mistake.

- Malayalam Bloggers, (blogging in Unicode malayalam)

Yahoo! India violates copyrights!

2007-02-12T12:32:00.000-08:00

Yahoo! India, an Indian subsidiary of Yahoo! Corporation launched a new Malayalam (Indian Language) Portal recently. While browsing through the contents, couple of Malayalam bloggers were shocked to find their published content (blogs that were protected under Creative Common Licensing rights) were smoothly lifted and placed on Yahoo! India’s portal.

Obviously, the bloggers were never contacted before this violation. A Malayalam recipe blog by blogger ‘Surgayathri’ had to suffer the major violation even though her blog is protected under Creative Common License. Other than Kariveppila blog, Yahoo! India stole contents from another web magazine (Puzha.com) too and from some other Malayalam bloggers.

If one checks the Kariveppila blog, prima facie evidence shows this whole thing was done on purpose since it was not a simple copy paste.

1. The pictures of the recipes were changed while using on the portal.
2. Some of the paragraphs were moved down and up on the recipe
3. Some sentences where structurally changed a little bit.

Since this is a Malayalam blog, a translation of the contents is shown here in English for a wider audience:

Six of her recipe posts were copied word by word. This is one of the example.

Recipe name: Erunellikka (This is a gooseberry pickle)

Recipe from Kariveppila post:
As the first paragraph, she writes about a common Malayalam language idiom “There is an idiom which says, older people’s wisdom first it might be taste bitter, then it will taste sweeter. Gooseberry is one such thing which reminds us of that and gooseberry is full of Vitamin C and is very good for you health”

Yahoo’s Recipe Post for Erunellikka:

The first paragraph starts with the same lines.

“There is an idiom which says, older people’s wisdom first it might be taste bitter, then it will taste sweeter. Gooseberry is one such thing which reminds us of that and gooseberry is full of Vitamin C and is very good for you health”

Second paragraph, she mentions about how we can pickle gooseberry and or even eat it fresh. This is not there on Yahoo! India’s site. Instead they have listed the ingredients.

Now, she writes how to make the pickle.

She starts her sentence with “To make gooseberry pickle, wash the good gooseberries, take water in a vessel and boil the gooseberry thoroughly. It should be cooked well so we can remove the seed from inside. There is no need to cook it longer, only until the gooseberry turns soft. After it is cold, we can remove the seed inside.”

Yahoo! India’s Recipe post for Erunelikka just copies that keeps as their third paragraph.

From Yahoo! India’s Recipe post,

“To make gooseberry pickle, wash the good gooseberries, take water in a vessel and boil the gooseberry thoroughly. It should be cooked well so we can remove the seed from inside. There is no need to cook it longer, only until the gooseberry turns soft. After it is cold, we can remove the seed inside.”

Next she writes about, how to do the rest of the pickle making.

She writes, “Take a saucepan and heat oil, sauté urad dal, then mustard, then red chilies whole, then sauté curry leaves, then add cooked gooseberry with salt. When the sautéed gooseberry becomes dry, add red chili powder and mix. Add asafotedia. If you are adding pickle powder instead of red chili powder, adding salt in lesser amount would be enough. No need to add asafotedia also then.”

Yahoo! India copies this without a word missing and writes the same.

“Take a saucepan and heat oil, sauté urad dal, then mustard, then red chilies whole, then sauté curry leaves, then add cooked gooseberry with salt. When the sautéed gooseberry becomes dry, add red chili powder and mix. Add asafotedia. If you are adding pickle powder instead of red chili powder, adding salt in lesser amount would be enough. No need to add asafotedia also then.”

Note: How can the recipe writer at Yahoo! India think about the same pickle powder what Suryagayathri thought about? Very, Strange! Isn’t it?

Now, the blogger writes about another method to make the same pickle.

Yahoo! India too has the same sentence.

She starts the second method of making the same pickle by writing.
“We can make this pickle in another way too”
Yahoo! India too does the same “We can make this pickle in another way too”

She explains in detail “Take oil in a vessel and heat; add the gooseberries which are washed and wiped thoroughly to this and sauté well. Take off from stove and remove the seed. Add salt and keep aside”

Yahoo! India has the same paragraph which translates to,
“Take oil in a vessel and heat; add the gooseberries which are washed and wiped thoroughly to this and sauté well. Take off from stove and remove the seed. Add salt and keep aside”

Her next paragraph says, “Heat little bit of oil in another vessel, add urad dal, mustard seeds, curry leaves, and sauté. Add salt and add the gooseberries. When it is dry, add red chili powder and asafotedia and mix well. Or use pickle powder”

Then the blogger writes in the next paragraph, “One should be using gingelly oil for this purpose. Initially fried gooseberry is better than boiled gooseberry”

Yahoo! India has the next paragraph the same way, which translates to,

“Heat little bit of oil in another vessel, add urad dal, mustard seeds, curry leaves, and sauté. Add salt and add the gooseberries. When it is dry, add red chili powder and asafotedia and mix well. Or use pickle powder”

Yahoo! India adds the last paragraph to this paragraph and has the same sentence and even the same tip too “One should be using gingelly oil for this purpose. Initially fried gooseberry is better than boiled gooseberry”

Writing the same recipes is not a common thing at all. But recipes copied word by word, sentence by sentence as you have seen above is a clear case of copyright violation.

There are five more recipes copied the same way from the Kariveppila blog.

Why do multinational million dollar corporations behave like this? Is it because they are sure individual freedom need not be respected?

Yahoo was contacted and they silently removed the pages without even acknowledging the violation or replying to the blogger. Don't they at least owe her an apology?

Below are the screenshots from Yahoo, if you can read Malayalam.

More screenshots...

Notes:

View a Lawyers opinion about this theft.
Related news item on Kairali Europe